From owner-cvs-all Wed Mar 22 18:19:53 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD3F37B586; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:19:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA98857; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:19:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 18:19:51 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: "Daniel O'Connor" Cc: Jean-Marc Zucconi , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, nate@yogotech.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86-4 Makefile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On 23-Mar-00 Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote: > > Yes, but a.out is obsolete :) and the port is more easily maintained (no > > need of extra files in PLIST). Anyway I don't think 2.x systems are > > ``officially'' supported by ports. > > I think that if its already IN the port why take it out.. It was only half-there since the xf86 4.0 upgrade.. > It defaults to 'no' anyway. No, this wasn't the a.out compatability libraries (we need those for netscape), it was support for BUILDING on an a.out machine (2.x). Kris ---- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message