From owner-freebsd-hubs Sun Apr 7 20:17:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mao.stokely.org (mao.stokely.org [65.84.64.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6641937B416; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 20:17:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mao.stokely.org (Postfix, from userid 2074) id CA5E04B669; Sun, 7 Apr 2002 20:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 20:17:24 -0700 From: Murray Stokely To: jason andrade Cc: Murray Stokely , hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How many sites have all of the i386 DP1 bits? Message-ID: <20020408031724.GC8008@freebsdmall.com> References: <20020408023623.GB8008@freebsdmall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Sender: owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 01:03:31PM +1000, jason andrade wrote: > i am a bit disappointed that the 5.0 dp1 iso release is inconsistent with > releases before it. why not create a 5.0 directory and put the images in > there since it is a multi cd release, rather than dropping them into the > main iso-images directory ? Hey Jason, It's inconsistent because it is not a normal release. There are just two images rather than 5. I think adding two extra text files and a directory would be unnecessary for just TWO files. Sheesh, that makes 3 releases in a row that you've followed up with minor nit-picks about release layout or announcements. We're not always going to think exactly alike, so please lets focus on more important issues. ;) - Murray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message