From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Apr 16 9:44:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5960637BB92; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 09:44:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA36927; Sun, 16 Apr 2000 20:44:35 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2000 20:44:34 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LIB_DEPENDS runs too early Message-ID: <20000416204434.A36898@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20000416053046.A27753@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from asami@freebsd.org on Sun, Apr 16, 2000 at 02:01:22AM -0700 Organization: Biomechanoid Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Apr 16, 2000 at 02:01:22AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > * IMHO it is too early and must be done on 'make configure' stage instead. > * I.e. saying 'make extract' I just want to see sources (and maybe decide > * that I don't need them) amd not want to install tons of LIB_DEPENDS > * targets in case I don't need this program. > > Maybe it is too early but some ports might need it (build-time > dependencies include programs needed for extraction). Why don't you As you say, "include programs", but not libs. I talk precisely about LIB_DEPENDS and not about other DEPENDS kinds. Libs are not needed for extraction, so I suggest to move _only_this_one_ LIB_DEPENDS to configure stage. > set NO_DEPENDS if you are just checking the sources? I know workaround exists, but better way will be to clarify scope of each DEPENDS properly. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message