Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:26:46 -0800 From: Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> To: Johannes Lundberg <johalun0@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ASLR Message-ID: <CAG6CVpVC6cC_9W-JOW48X-BS9ZfK1t0VB9_cLqaEWQDx=trEcg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAECmPwse97FLUa=%2B_xd86P8mb9y5Wp1mTUZHQVhkPC7KTi4gWg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAECmPwse97FLUa=%2B_xd86P8mb9y5Wp1mTUZHQVhkPC7KTi4gWg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Johannes Lundberg <johalun0@gmail.com> wro= te: > Hi > > What is the status of ASLR? > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5603 > > The thread has been silent for a couple of months. I'm happy to test if > needed. Hi Johannes, I think we were waiting on some review, but if that has stalled out, let's go ahead and commit it. Default off is fine for now. It can be improved as needed and then we at least have an ASLR story for the checkbox users. > I'm also interested in KASLR. Is that also on the roadmap? If someone > involved could share some info I'd be grateful. KASLR is less useful (grsecurity folks might say useless) =E2=80=94 see https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3D7&t=3D3367 for some discussion on it. Best, Conrad
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG6CVpVC6cC_9W-JOW48X-BS9ZfK1t0VB9_cLqaEWQDx=trEcg>