Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:40:01 GMT
From:      Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/178250: Fix build failures of japanese/{mozc-server, mozc-tool, ibus-mozc, mozc-el}
Message-ID:  <201304301840.r3UIe15W005646@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/178250; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
To: abtk@shitamachi.org
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/178250: Fix build failures of japanese/{mozc-server,
 mozc-tool, ibus-mozc, mozc-el}
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 03:36:08 +0900 (JST)

 ----Security_Multipart(Wed_May__1_03_36_08_2013_641)--
 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 
 Tadaaki Nagao <abtk@shitamachi.org> wrote
   in <20130501.012308.420345141091390850.abtk@shitamachi.org>:
 
 ab> When I wrote the patch I previously sent, my intention was to preserve
 ab> original code as much as possible.  As for why they were so written in
 ab> the first place, please ask the original author... (daichi-san?)
 
  I am also not sure why, but they simply shouldn't have been
  committed.  The previous change is fairly broken as you noticed.  We
  do not have to preserve the wrong part.
 
 ab> But I agree with you that those BUILD_DEPENDS should be got rid of in
 ab> favor of some other preferable ways.  I will look into this, but it will
 ab> take some time because Mozc's build system looks to me too complicated
 ab> to understand.  In the meanwhile, how about applying my patch as a quick
 ab> fix for the current breakage, and having refinements later as a second
 ab> step.
 
  I already submitted a similar fix.  Can you review it?
 
   http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/mozc_port_20130428-2.diff (patch)
   http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/mozc_port_full_20130428-2.tar.gz (tarball of the patched ports)
 
  Although I received a build error report in some environment and
  still investigating it, this should fix wrong parts (including style
  clean-ups) as far as I can see.
 
 -- Hiroki
 
 ----Security_Multipart(Wed_May__1_03_36_08_2013_641)--
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (FreeBSD)
 
 iEYEABECAAYFAlGADxgACgkQTyzT2CeTzy3ibgCfT1MCo+6nd7reFluTXkPqzu1z
 cFkAoKSdpPQjATaj2eHG4ArNqDJukbXV
 =u58M
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 ----Security_Multipart(Wed_May__1_03_36_08_2013_641)----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201304301840.r3UIe15W005646>