From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 20:59:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FF416A4CE for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:59:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao05.cox.net (lakemtao05.cox.net [68.1.17.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531A243D49 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:59:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040325045929.CVKZ21704.lakemtao05.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com> for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:59:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 23:00:05 -0600 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518 Subject: Sign your name in pkg-descr is useless or useful? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 04:59:29 -0000 Hello, I just now noticed that in the Porter handbook said: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-desc.html#AEN81 ================================================ It is recommended that you sign your name at the end of this file, as in: This is a port of oneko, in which a cat chases a poor mouse all over the screen. : (etc.) WWW: http://www.oneko.org/ - Satoshi asami@cs.berkeley.edu ================================================ I think, it's useless because most of us don't do it. Also, we already have the Whom: and MAINTAINER in the Makefile. It seems to me that sign our name in it is making no sense for pkg-descr as in description file. Cheers, Mezz -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.