From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 14 10:41:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5A316A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:41:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from huva.hittite.isp.9tel.net (huva.hittite.isp.9tel.net [62.62.156.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6B243D54 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:41:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clefevre-lists@9online.fr) Received: from pc2k (30-114-118-80.kaptech.net [80.118.114.30]) by huva.hittite.isp.9tel.net (Postfix) with SMTP id CDFE59BF24; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:42:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <001501c451fc$1479edc0$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> From: "Cyrille Lefevre" To: , "'Edwin Groothuis'" References: Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:40:58 +0200 Organization: ACME MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SETIATHOME PORT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:41:01 -0000 "Rob Craig" wrote: > Hello all, > > Had had loads of problems over the last few days. Looks like the problem is > related to the work unit. Same symptoms as before. TOP reporting SETIATHOME > at 96% but not doing anything. Killing the service and restarting does > nothing. I deleted the work unit and it then grabs another and works?? > > Should I do edit my files as you say below? If you didn't edited them yet, this may help to see what's happen. if you have some trace of what's happen, please, post them. however, if this problem is really related to how setiathome works inside, I'll not be able to do something, since we don't have access to the sources. so, in this case, a bug report would have to be sent using the "bug report form" at http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/help.html PS : the only thing I can do is to add a keyword to the startup script to delete the current work unit and eventually another keyword to check if the current work unit is still alive (well, I don't really know how to do this, this I can't reproduce anything, do you have any idea about that ?). Cyrille Lefevre. -- home: mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net