From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Oct 24 1:40: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0266037B405 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 01:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f9O8e1k34167; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 01:40:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 01:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200110240840.f9O8e1k34167@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: FUJISHIMA Satsuki Subject: Re: ports/31465: nasty loop in ports/print/ft2demos Reply-To: FUJISHIMA Satsuki Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/31465; it has been noted by GNATS. From: FUJISHIMA Satsuki To: Peter Pentchev Cc: KANOU Hiroki , FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/31465: nasty loop in ports/print/ft2demos Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:37:46 +0900 At Tue, 23 Oct 2001 23:20:01 -0700 (PDT), Peter Pentchev wrote: > Yep, it does seem to be related. Makefile rev. 1.5 uses ${PORTSDIR} > in a != construct, which is evaluated *before* the inclusion of bsd.port.mk > which defines PORTSDIR. I wrote that part and it worked for me because I set PORTSDIR explicitly. I'll commit your patch soon. Thanks Peter. And apologize to break your port, Hiroki. -- FUJISHIMA Satsuki To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message