From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Nov 12 12:45:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABA01ACA58 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [195.149.99.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "raven.bwct.de", Issuer "raven.bwct.de" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47C6tB0BRLz4WLg for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:45:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from mail.cicely.de ([10.1.1.37]) by raven.bwct.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xACCkaLZ095422 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:46:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cicely.de; s=default; t=1573562798; bh=mKtN0OIrkirX7q8MU/wiaGUr5n+dLQgppy+mOaD+0rA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To; b=ajJYtyDbjlsAHv0VKvIuPrRmfEg/WSMYmNb+1ohdch5CVEirqJpJ4C9s+CAeCY9tm YfTZL0y2G1kZEiYyOkq4wVHMaJ1sqclG2dfQ6ep4HMrBoUeA1OL6eOWcq4vIakg/k1 v3By1JrqMAqnkHJMH7Vhk4je0OqMweH+AdTguQTA= Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (cicely7.cicely.de [10.1.1.9]) by mail.cicely.de (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xACCjirY047324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:45:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: from cicely7.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xACCjh5n034780; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:45:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely7.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely7.cicely.de (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xACCjeri034779; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:45:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:45:40 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Nenhum_de_Nos , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Choose between Raspberry Pi 4B 4GB and ROCKPro64 Message-ID: <20191112124539.GM43404@cicely7.cicely.de> Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de References: <7b75e2ed23e334878fbb3c1d585ffc51.squirrel@10.1.1.11> <20191015220433.GS96402@funkthat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191015220433.GS96402@funkthat.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely7.cicely.de 12.0-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on spamd.cicely.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47C6tB0BRLz4WLg X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=cicely.de header.s=default header.b=ajJYtyDb; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ticso@cicely7.cicely.de has no SPF policy when checking 195.149.99.3) smtp.mailfrom=ticso@cicely7.cicely.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.79 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[ticso@cicely.de]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[cicely.de:s=default]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.987,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cicely.de]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[cicely.de:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.99.149.195.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.20.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21461, ipnet:195.149.99.0/24, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.00)[country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:45:55 -0000 On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 03:04:33PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote this message on Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 23:31 -0300: > > I am about to buy a new arm box and would like it to be the most powerfull > > I can get and still get to use FreeBSD somewhere not so far from now. I > > know RPi4 is not supported right now, but as I have both RPi2B and RPi3B > > and they run fine, my guess is the 4B will have its time also. > > > > So it then comes down to 4B or ROCKPro64. I saw Pine64 images, but I could > > not find much information about the ROCKPro64. I looked for some > > benchmarks to know the faster CPU, and it looks like the RK3399 is a bit > > faster. As the board has more features, I am asking here, if this has even > > an answer, what board has better future in FreeBSD. > > > > Thanks in advance :) > > RockPro64 work is still ongoing. It is coming along though, and it does > boot. There is still lots of work to do, like properly support the > big.little cores and the like. > > I have mine booting from SD card, but it isn't yet full speed (though > I need to test some of the fixes that have been committed. This sounds great already. Just got my RockPro64 4G today. Any advise on how to build an image? The u-boot has to go into the SPI-Flash or on the card? Also have to check the board documentation for the console pins. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.