Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 1 May 2020 17:24:41 +0100
From:      Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: VirtualBox binary not existing
Message-ID:  <20200501172441.4e3e8361f5d0e303b131fe0f@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <2EB69D33-65A6-4818-A74E-0DA8605C6516@kukulies.org>
References:  <FC3D3CCF-609E-4E0A-B766-CF83ED1F91F4@kukulies.org> <c909fcb0-b36f-0ad6-a29e-6fb1ba25e9a0@fastmail.com> <2EB69D33-65A6-4818-A74E-0DA8605C6516@kukulies.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Fri, 1 May 2020 18:09:53 +0200
Christoph Kukulies <kuku@kukulies.org> wrote:

> I was used to use sh (Bourne sh) under root 21 years ago. So I switched
> it back from csh to sh. Wondering why they switched to csh anyway. It is
> a tastelessness. ;)

	Tradition, csh has been a BSD thing forever.

-- 
Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200501172441.4e3e8361f5d0e303b131fe0f>