From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sun May 9 21:55:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from pokey.local.net (arc1-80.netwalk.net [206.175.61.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A9315290 for ; Sun, 9 May 1999 21:55:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmutter@netwalk.com) Received: from insomnia (insomnia.local.net [192.168.2.3]) by pokey.local.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id AAA85977 for ; Mon, 10 May 1999 00:55:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jmutter@insomnia.local.net) Reply-To: From: "James A. Mutter" To: Subject: The Mindcraft Benchmarks Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 00:58:54 -0400 Message-ID: <000001be9aa1$cd7a2960$0302a8c0@local.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I know this happened a while ago, but I was browsing Mindcraft's "rebuttals to all our bad press of late" section and found this. I thought it was interesting... Mr. Martinez printed only part of the answer I gave him about the response to a newsgroup posting about tuning Linux on the server we were testing. What he did not publish was that I told him the response said we would see much better performance with FreeBSD than Linux. It's obvious why he didn't publish that part. This from: http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/rebut-abcnews.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message