Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Jan 2002 19:17:52 -0200
From:      Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Cc:        cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/cvsd Makefile
Message-ID:  <20020108211814.65693.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
In-Reply-To: <200201081550.HAA02529@windsor.research.att.com>; from fenner@research.att.com on Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 07:50:17AM -0800
References:  <200201072038.g07Kc5i40692@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020108091623.16370.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> <200201081550.HAA02529@windsor.research.att.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 07:50:17AM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote:
> Maybe I think our users are smarter than you do, but I guess I've
> never had a problem understanding that no MAINTAINER line in a port
> makefile meant that the port had no MAINTAINER.

	I do not want to start an argument here but your reply was
uncalled for. I mean, I just pointed out that having a MAINTAINER
line inside a Makefile makes pretty clear WHO the maintainer is
without any guesswork (reading additional documentation puts anyone
above the average line).
	I was not saying ppl are stupid just but having it makes
it pretty clear. I am quoting the original message. Perhaps, my
intentions were not clear the 1st time. Besides, I hope your reply
was not a flame (I tried not to understand it that way) but it
surely sounded like it.
	I understand your arguments, I was merely pointing out
a reason for keeping it. Particularly, I do not care if it's there
or not. If it was for me, I would ditch anything that can be moved
inside bsd.port.mk but then it would remove some of the easy of
read from many, many ppl. Just think of some of our slave ports
around the tree. They illustrate it pretty well.

	My 2 cents,


ps: Original quote:

>	In theory, I agree. In practice, we want users to be able to
> check the Makefile and have the maintainer address there.
>        Sub-optimal but true. :(

-- 
Mario S F Ferreira - DF - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature."
Computer Science Undergraduate | FreeBSD Committer | CS Developer
flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org
feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020108211814.65693.qmail>