Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 06 Jun 1997 15:45:08 -0600
From:      "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com>
To:        Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>
Cc:        "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Extremely poor interactive response under heave SCSI load 
Message-ID:  <199706062046.OAA01894@pluto.plutotech.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Jun 1997 21:23:23 BST." <l03020903afbe216182fb@[194.32.164.2]> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>At 21:34 +0100 6/6/97, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
>>Even better hack.  Just send an ordered transaction every once in a while
>>which will flush any "starved" simple-tagged transactions.  This means that
>>you can always keep the queue full.
>
>Is that [slipping in an ordered transaction when there's a bunch of
>unordered transactions 'up the pipe'] actually going to work  as desired
>for all the controllers of interest?

If you don't have a tagged queueing controller/device combination, than the
problem you brought up doesn't apply.  If you do, the spec mandates that
order tags be supported and sending one will have the desired effect.

>--
>Bob Bishop              (0118) 977 4017  international code +44 118
>rb@gid.co.uk        fax (0118) 989 4254  between 0800 and 1800 UK

--
Justin T. Gibbs
===========================================
  FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations
===========================================





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706062046.OAA01894>