Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 09:47:03 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request For Review: libc/libc_r changes to allow -lc_r Message-ID: <20010122094703.F93103@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101222102230.28114-100000@besplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:40:52PM %2B1100 References: <200101210002.f0L02rk43575@mobile.wemm.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101222102230.28114-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 09:40:52PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > I think it would be more confusing without the explicit underscores. > The library really does call the underscored versions. To debug it > you need to put breakpoints at the underscored versions... I sympathize with that point of view and indeed it describes how I felt about it at first, before I went src/lib/libc hacking. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010122094703.F93103>