From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 22:07:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6016B16A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 22:07:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m24.mx.aol.com (imo-m24.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B4743D31 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 22:07:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4526@aol.com) Received: from TM4526@aol.com by imo-m24.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id n.6.37067090 (4254) for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:07:18 -0500 (EST) From: TM4526@aol.com Message-ID: <6.37067090.2eb80d95@aol.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:07:17 EST To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5114 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: Compatible NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:07:22 -0000 In a message dated 11/1/04 4:37:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, krinklyfig@spymac.com writes: > "Don't use 5.x because its slow" IS technical help. You guys just dont > want anyone to say it. >"You guys?" I wasn't aware that I was representing anyone but myself. > >It seems all you want to do is contradict people, and without any data to back >yourself up Actually, I'm the only one who HAS presented my test data. And as for this subject, everyone knows that the realtek chip is a piece of garbage, so Im not sure who you're accusing me of contradicting. You don't even know what this thread was about to start with apparently, so YOU are the one wasting people's time here. Try reading entire messages instead of one line that suits you. You might learn something. I promise that I know a lot more than you do about the subjects at hand.