Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 18:43:31 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Akinori -Aki- MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> Cc: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/dryad Makefile ports/devel/dryad/patches patch-aa patch-ab ports/graphics/eog Makefile ports/graphics/eog/patches patch-aa patch-ab patch-ac ports/editors/gedit Makefile ports/editors/gedit/patches patch-ao ... Message-ID: <398AE4A3.53284EAF@FreeBSD.org> References: <200008040134.SAA73918@freefall.freebsd.org> <86zomtp19w.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote: > At Thu, 3 Aug 2000 18:34:41 -0700 (PDT), > aDe wrote: > > Extensive patchfile cleanups using sobomax's wonderful > > post-extract rule > > Hmm.. I think you should use pre-patch or post-patch for that purpose. > I mean, "extract" stage should only consist of extracting files, > removing unnecessary files, and creating or copying necessary files, > when patching and editing files belong in "patch" (or "configure") > stage. > > >From my point of view, "make extract" should just extract the > distributed files as-is, so one can stand at the start point and look > around to find out what materials are provided by the vendor(s). I > suppose that would help him/her try (another) hacking on it. Agreed. Then the libtool hack should be moved into pre-patch stage as well because currently it modifies files after patches has been applied, so you have to remember it each time you are doing "diff -du configure.orig configure" for the libtoolish port. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?398AE4A3.53284EAF>