Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:46:47 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c (fwd) Message-ID: <41DDEA07.7000106@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <1105050997.27981.26.camel@palm.tree.com> References: <20041214222444.GA9668@flash.atmos.colostate.edu> <20041215215422.GA19373@flash.atmos.colostate.edu> <41C0BA64.3080908@elischer.org> <200501061430.36820.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <41DDAEA9.90401@elischer.org> <1105050997.27981.26.camel@palm.tree.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 16:33, Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>>Why are struct procs forced to be type-stable? >>> >>> >>> >>I have forgotten.. but they did.. >>Peter also knew at one stage and he too has forgotten :-) >> >> > > > I vaguely remember it was something to do with some other structure still hanging off the proc. Maybe the vm or something really disgusting like that. possibly it was something like needing the page tables to hang around or something but that can't be right as they are taken apart.... aren't they?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41DDEA07.7000106>