Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:55:16 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] cpu time accounting patch, step 2 Message-ID: <5383.1139586916@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:22:24 EST." <17388.44976.250463.383429@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <17388.44976.250463.383429@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>, Andrew Gallatin writes: >Here are some benchmark results from my "AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual >Core Processor 3800+" running an SMP kernel for both loopback and >10GbE TCP networks. The executive summary is that there's a 41% >improvement in loopback pingpong, and a 12.5% improvement in a >pingpong test with a remote linux machine over 10GbE. Since the linux >machine isn't infinately fast, the improvement is probably a bit more >than 12.5% ;) That's a LOT more than I had hoped for... Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5383.1139586916>