Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 07:49:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Laurence Berland <stuyman@confusion.net> To: "Derek C." <coffee@blarg.net> Cc: Sung Nae Cho <sucho2@quasar.phys.vt.edu>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Okay! Accept my sincerely apology. Didn't see that from handbook. Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96.1010725074927.29686E-100000@euphoria.confusion.net> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010724222221.02edfe80@mail.blarg.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
freebsd-chat methinks? I'm not on chat, so /me ducks if anyone from -chat doesn't like that idea... On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Derek C. wrote: > Thank you Sung. We are happy to have you here, so long as you keep the > postings on topic, and polite. If you are ever frustrated and feel the need > to rant, perhaps you should start a Yahoo! group called freebsd-rant (I'll > join it if you do)... Maybe, one day, the kind folks here at FreeBSD.org > will become hip to the need for such a forum, and open one, but until then, > we appreciate you keeping your posts on topic and friendly. > > Derek > > At 10:17 PM 7/24/2001, Sung Nae Cho wrote: > >Okay, > > > >I apologize to all FreeBSD users. I wasn't aware of the posting rule in > >handbook. Once again, my sincerely apology goes to you all. > > > >"The topic of any posting should adhere to the basic charter of the > >list it is posted to, e.g. if the list is about technical issues then > >your posting should contain technical discussion. Ongoing irrelevant > >chatter or flaming only detracts from the value of the mailing list > >for everyone on it and will not be tolerated." > > > > > >Sung N. Cho > > > > > > > > > >On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > > > > OK, sorry, but play time is over and it's time for you to take your > > > pill and return to your room for the night. These nice men will help > > > you on with your special jacket so you don't hurt yourself again, OK? > > > You hear me Sung? Yes, I know about the voices telling you to post > > > these messages, I do, but we've been over all that BEFORE Sung! Bad > > > Sung! You know what happens when you post bad thoughts to the mailing > > > lists, remember? It's in the handbook charters we read every morning > > > when we get up, isn't it Sung? Can you tell me what those rules are? > > > Come on Sung, we know those rules don't we? Yes we do, we read them > > > in the handbook, can we say them now? Very good, let's say them > > > together: > > > > > > "The topic of any posting should adhere to the basic charter of the > > > list it is posted to, e.g. if the list is about technical issues then > > > your posting should contain technical discussion. Ongoing irrelevant > > > chatter or flaming only detracts from the value of the mailing list > > > for everyone on it and will not be tolerated." > > > > > > Now Sung, you know these rules and you know what the nice men have to > > > do when you don't follow them, don't you? Yes, they have to insist. > > > We don't like it when they have to insist, do we Sung? No we don't. > > > We don't like it at all. We don't let you post to the mailing lists > > > anymore when that happens, do we Sung? That's right. We have to ban > > > Sung. Be a good Sung and stay away from the mailing lists when the > > > voices are telling you bad things, just like we told you, OK Sung? > > > The nice men don't want to have to insist. Good Sung! The nice > > > men will take you to your room now, go with them. That's right. > > > Bye bye Sung! > > > > > > [Whew! Thank god for Lithium and sendmail access lists, that's > > > all I've got to say!] > > > > > > From: Sung Nae Cho <sucho2@quasar.phys.vt.edu> > > > Subject: Bullshit! Mac OS X is not FreeBSD. Get real please. > > > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 00:36:06 -0400 (EDT) > > > > > > > Okay, don't give me crap like I'm troll or anything stupid for I'm > > FreeBSD > > > > user. But, I think there is a double standards in BSD community. First > > > > of all, MAC OS X is not FreeBSD. How can it be a FreeBSD if it has > > > > totally different core except that it has a FreeBSD user land commands? > > > > Or, have I heard this wrong? 2nd, I personally don't see the difference > > > > between APPLE and MICROSOFT. At least Microsoft doesn't pretend to be > > > > friends with Open Sourced Community. APPLE is bullshit company. It > > > > builds an OS based on Open Source and they're making it a proprietary. > > > > That's bullshit! 3rd, OS X is a one crappy OS I've ever seen! Infact, > > > > most APPLE users have gone back to OS 9 because OS X requires them to buy > > > > all the softwares (Office suites...etc) built for OS X since the > > emulation > > > > is terrible and utterally useless (TOO DAMN SLOW!). > > > > > > > > It's also bullshit that FreeBSD community cannot throw away it's > > pride and > > > > accept the defeat and try to learn from it. We all heard that in recent > > > > benchmark, both Linux 2.4 and Windows 2000 kick FreeBSD butt in > > > > performance. FreeBSDers complained so they did the test again with all > > > > the optimizations enabled and FreeBSD still couldn't beat both Windows > > > > 2000 and Linux 2.4 (not to mention, Linux 2.4 and Win 2000 didn't even > > > > receive special treat for getting tuned.) Come one people! Let's > > cut the > > > > bull shit and get real. I'm sick of this idiots just saying this and > > that > > > > without actually contributing anything to FreeBSD development. I hope > > > > FreeBSD 5.x does a milestone just like Linux 2.4 and Windows 2000 did. > > > > Also, don't give me the crap like Windows 2000 and Linux are unstable! > > > > I've tried em and Windows 2000 is a totally different beast than any > > > > previous Windows (2000 is stable as a rock!). So is Linux. Linux 2.4 is > > > > even stabler! > > > > > > > > Why then do I use FreeBSD? I use FreeBSD not because it's better than > > > > Linux or Windows 2000, not because it has better hardware support than > > > > Linux or Windows, but just because I like the consistent layout of the > > > > file structures. Redhat seems to move around files on every release. > > > > Also, ports collections seem to be handy when I'm not in mood to compile > > > > manually (not that I can't do it in Linux). I wish FreeBSD 5.x finally > > > > get support for my new Kensington USB (OPTICAL) mouse on my Laptop! I > > > > don't know about FreeBSD hardware support on desktops, but laptop > > hardware > > > > support is simply not impressive! I'm not about to go back to wheel > > based mouse > > > > (got tired of cleaning wheels). > > > > > > > > I hope this doesn't offend anyone. (Just got tired of listening to crap!) > > > > > > > > Sung N. Cho > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > Laurence Berland http://www.isp.northwestern.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96.1010725074927.29686E-100000>