Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:39:50 -0400
From:      Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com>
To:        Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Cc:        Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, FreeBSD questions <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn & new pkg system
Message-ID:  <513CC566.9050104@a1poweruser.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130310173148.02bd958efa4538938992dc97@sohara.org>
References:  <513BC4E2.4040708@a1poweruser.com> <87ppz8ceje.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20795.63556.581627.956239@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20130310150820.GA20819@saturn> <513CC04C.3020403@a1poweruser.com> <20130310173148.02bd958efa4538938992dc97@sohara.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:18:04 -0400
> Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> wrote:
> 
>> No body has made a case for NOT including svn in the base system. If it 
>> can be a port there is no reason why it can not be included in the base 
>> system.
> 
> 	Giorgos did when he said "Subversion is a large system, with a ton
> of dependencies" which translates to a lot of work to keep it up to date in
> the base system, and all sorts of fun and games when other things using
> those dependencies need a newer version.
> 

And how is that any different from any other package or pkgng situation.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?513CC566.9050104>