From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jun 12 19:07:53 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA25448 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 19:07:53 -0700 Received: from dataplex.net (SHARK.DATAPLEX.NET [199.183.109.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA25441 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 19:07:49 -0700 Received: from [199.183.109.242] by dataplex.net with SMTP (MailShare 1.0b8); Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:07:44 -0500 X-Sender: wacky@shark.dataplex.net Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:07:48 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org From: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Subject: What to mirror Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Now with the ever growing list of releases (and releases to be), I need to know which "distributions" I should offer on my mirror site. Since 2.0.5 was released, I guess it is appropriate to delete the "SNAP"s. Should I keep 2.0 Release? What is the preferred sourcing method to keep me up to date for each of the releases (2.0, 2.1, 2.2)? I, for one, would like to advocate a CTM distribution list for the source of each of the release trees. IMHO, this method is particularly efficient for sporatically changing filesets because my update is triggered by an event at the source end rather than requiring me to periodically poll to see if something has changed. ---- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@dataplex.net