Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:39:25 -0400 From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/roff/groff Makefile Message-ID: <20021021103925.A5787@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <200210210026.g9L0Qm38097098@repoman.freebsd.org>; from obrien@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 05:26:48PM -0700 References: <200210210026.g9L0Qm38097098@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David E. O'Brien [obrien@FreeBSD.org] wrote: > obrien 2002/10/20 17:26:48 PDT > > Modified files: > gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/roff/groff Makefile > Log: > Unbreak Alpha world. > We are seeing "/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: groff: too few PT_LOAD segments", > however it appears that there really is only one PT_LOAD segment in the groff > binary. It is unclear if `rtld' or `ld' is at fault here -- but using an > RELENG_4 `ld' binary allows one to build a working dynamic groff binary. It is quite clear that ld is at fault here, as there is only one PT_LOAD segment in the binary. As I mentioned in my earlier email, the point at which rtld craps out is way before any md code is run .. its just reading the elf headers and finding only one PT_LOAD segment. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021021103925.A5787>