From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 22:34:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A51016A401 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44B113C428 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:34:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [88.66.45.53] (helo=amd64.laiers.local) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML21M-1HNcnk1Rg9-0001mw; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 23:34:06 +0100 From: Max Laier Organization: FreeBSD To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:33:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <45E8D523.9010205@innter.net> <45E9F5B7.5000007@innter.net> In-Reply-To: <45E9F5B7.5000007@innter.net> X-Face: ,,8R(x[kmU]tKN@>gtH1yQE4aslGdu+2]; R]*pL,U>^H?)gW@49@wdJ`H<=?utf-8?q?=25=7D*=5FBD=0A=09U=5For=3D=5CmOZf764=26nYj=3DJYbR1PW0ud?=>|!~,,CPC.1-D$FG@0h3#'5"k{V]a~.<=?utf-8?q?mZ=7D44=23Se=7Em=0A=09Fe=7E=5C=5DX5B=5D=5Fxj?=(ykz9QKMw_l0C2AQ]}Ym8)fU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1592811.1MQg2Ln1YY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703032333.59573.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 X-Provags-ID2: V01U2FsdGVkX18rC5zRfZRNme7qTKL7bQIWKtZe3hCdOCxObmF CXwg4DE9EVEhCl+2yoN3I2miOidNNSjIV5EbjjLOFs9wV2ARAw NusPTcU+768o0H+r3SWYQ== Cc: Subject: Re: PF performance problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 22:34:13 -0000 --nextPart1592811.1MQg2Ln1YY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 03 March 2007 23:24, Sergey N. Romanov wrote: > Chris Buechler wrote: > > You should really find a better way to test your server > > Thanks for your info. > I don't know how to make requests from many different ips. > I can assign 100 - 200 ip addresses to a network interface on > web-server and then will make requests to all these addresses from some > different servers at once. I will have more realistic results with this > test? You can also do the same on the probe host. Usually the benchmark tools=20 have an option to specify the source address to bind to. You should also=20 change "net.inet.ip.portrange" ... esp. turn of ".randomized" and set ".[hi]first" to something lower e.g. 1025 =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1592811.1MQg2Ln1YY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBF6ffXXyyEoT62BG0RAujiAJ9A521nT9oYhEy1Boaz/ZX4JKt4gQCfRW13 qKX/zr0EunT/pjt8A/3Yly0= =vTi1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1592811.1MQg2Ln1YY--