From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 5 12:30:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E464D16A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net (audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18E143D54 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 12:30:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 20-74.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.20.74] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by audiogram.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.36 #4) id 1BAZnP-0008B1-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 12:30:11 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:31:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <20040405191308.GB1800@cs025_2k> <200404051223.06090.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200404051223.06090.kstewart@owt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404051431.02337.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b78e47ae2fc003c801029813f5dc6c09c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: Joshua Lokken cc: Gerry Freymann cc: Kent Stewart Subject: Re: libintl.so.5 not found and general ports question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 19:30:14 -0000 On Monday 05 April 2004 02:23 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Monday 05 April 2004 12:13 pm, Joshua Lokken wrote: > > * Kent Stewart [2004-04-05 12:06]: > > > On Monday 05 April 2004 11:51 am, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > > > What would happen if a link called /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.5 > > > > was created to point to the existing libintl.so.* file on Gerry's > > > > system? > > > > > > The library interface was changed and cross linking is a really bad > > > idea. > > > > I was able to work around the problem temporarily (on 4-stable) with > > the above method (symlink), but Kent is probably right that it's not > > an ideal solution. > > It is worse than that. It is how off by one or many security problems > crop up. You call a library function and it doesn't return what you > think it was returning. > > Find out what is wrong and fix the problem. > > Kent Thank you for the warning and example. Andrew Gould