Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:24:29 -0800
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Luciano Rottava da Silva <rottava@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: olvwm on amd64
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmomgnyUWeA79rT%2BuMkMS3M_sK2_a%2BcajXLM5MWkgXd8_vw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGROAxVNnM0tURzNQ0_paWeRUPHX_D4V=5g5QNzz2ZCNP1gvHA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAGROAxU0OK7ZZYpuaqFQ3u6UjiUSeBE18adcpudoxcjtFodATQ@mail.gmail.com> <546E5D2D.6010603@gmail.com> <CAGROAxUzdfZEzfaix_NFbNXHsHJJ7yR9U2bxgOA3_KtNWh8aKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomBnv4JGUz0SzeSh0hRRPsgPtFdewTOKTM4ruOdjQoiRw@mail.gmail.com> <54700218.8090300@bananmonarki.se> <CAJ-Vmo=%2BArMdHW=dnbpt5rR20gtTahUquQr-nGrsC052icWvpw@mail.gmail.com> <54708578.5070401@bananmonarki.se> <54708DC4.8070209@bananmonarki.se> <CAGROAxWoPB-eSXF9YUW8oNO8%2B2oZNX-b_fEDM=t72bJ_FPqkuA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGROAxX5m2iRhu83mz6e6MR0vvtPCBQkLpVLJLqtyDAwYBYRtg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGROAxVNnM0tURzNQ0_paWeRUPHX_D4V=5g5QNzz2ZCNP1gvHA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'll take a look at why xview is segfaulting on amd64. Hopefully it's
something stupid.

As for xvfilemgr - wow, that's a project that hasn't been updated in a
long time. :( I couldn't even get it to finish running configure.



-a


On 26 November 2014 at 17:12, Luciano Rottava da Silva
<rottava@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just to let you know and for the records, I've managed to run olvwm in
> FreeBSD 10.1 amd64.
>
> Since copying files from a i386 Linux machine was not working out, I've
> decided to compile all packages.
>
> So I did the following:
>
> 1. Setup a jail running a fresh FBSD 10.1 i386.
> 2. Started building ports for xview* and all packages I was interested to.
> 3. Moved files from jail to my amd64 machine.
>
> After adjusting some env vars, I had the pleasure to run this beautiful and
> light wm which brings me very good memories from the 90's when I used to
> spend some nights in front of Sparc stations.
>
> Now I have an almost 100% funcional working environment.
>
> I am missing only one thing, a xview-based file manager too. Tried to
> compile xvfilemgr but was not successfull.
>
> Question, is there anybody out there also still using ol(v)wm? If so, could
> you please share with me the binary for xvfilemgr?
>
> And for last, cmdtool and shelltool were built from ports correctly but are
> not working. Everytime I try to exec them, they complain about "pty's".
>
> [luciano@desktop ~/app32/bin]$ ./shelltool
> All pty's in use
> XView error: NULL pointer passed to xv_set
>
> I guess this version from ports was patched to fix this error, but it seems
> it is not.
>
> Best Regards,
> Luciano.
>
> On 23 November 2014 at 00:21, Luciano Rottava da Silva <rottava@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Someone could please explain what is going on? I am afraid I have no more
>> ideas.
>>
>> ### binary olvwm from latest i386 FreeBSD package, downloaded and expanded
>> in a temp dir:
>>
>> root@desktop:/tmp/XVIEW/bin # file olvwm
>> olvwm: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD),
>> dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for FreeBSD 9.1, stripped
>>
>> ### checking shared libs dependency:
>>
>> root@desktop:/tmp/XVIEW/bin # ldd olvwm
>> olvwm:
>>         libXpm.so.4 => not found (0)
>>         libolgx.so.3 => /usr/lib32/libolgx.so.3 (0x280ad000)
>>         libXext.so.6 => not found (0)
>>         libX11.so.6 => not found (0)
>>         libm.so.5 => /usr/lib32/libm.so.5 (0x280bb000)
>>         libc.so.7 => /usr/lib32/libc.so.7 (0x280e4000)
>>
>> ### checking if missing libs are known by the system:
>>
>> root@desktop:/tmp/XVIEW/bin # ldconfig -32 -r | head -2
>> /var/run/ld-elf32.so.hints:
>>         search directories: /usr/lib32:/usr/local/lib32/compat
>>
>> ### double checking (the same result for all missing libs):
>>
>> root@desktop:/tmp/XVIEW/bin # file /usr/local/lib32/compat/libXpm.so.4
>> /usr/local/lib32/compat/libXpm.so.4: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel
>> 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked, not stripped
>>
>> ### RPATH says what?
>> root@desktop:/tmp/XVIEW/bin # readelf -d olvwm
>>
>> Dynamic section at offset 0x44014 contains 26 entries:
>>   Tag        Type                         Name/Value
>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libXpm.so.4]
>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libolgx.so.3]
>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libXext.so.6]
>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libX11.so.6]
>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libm.so.5]
>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libc.so.7]
>>  0x0000000f (RPATH)                      Library rpath: [/usr/local/lib]
>>
>> ### trying to change RPATH with below setenv
>>
>> root@desktop:/tmp/XVIEW/bin # cat /root/.cshrc | grep LIBRARY
>> setenv LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH /usr/local/lib32/compat:/usr/lib32
>>
>> ### no success. )-:
>>
>> root@desktop:/tmp/XVIEW/bin # ./olvwm
>> /usr/local/lib/libXpm.so.4: unsupported file layout
>>
>>
>> What can I do?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Luciano.
>>
>>
>> On 22 November 2014 at 13:34, Luciano Rottava da Silva <rottava@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> No chaps, I am not trying to compile xview or olvwm. I am just trying to
>>> run them - the FreeBSD 32-bit version - on my amd64.
>>>
>>> So I downloaded the binary packages, xview* and olvwm from ftp server.
>>>
>>> Then untar and now trying to put the 32-bit version of the shared
>>> libraries in the right paths in order to run olvwm.
>>>
>>> root@desktop:/tmp/XVIEW/bin # readelf -d olvwm
>>>
>>> Dynamic section at offset 0x44014 contains 26 entries:
>>>   Tag        Type                         Name/Value
>>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libXpm.so.4]
>>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libolgx.so.3]
>>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libXext.so.6]
>>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libX11.so.6]
>>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libm.so.5]
>>>  0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libc.so.7]
>>>  0x0000000f (RPATH)                      Library rpath: [/usr/local/lib]
>>>
>>> Like I said, problem seems to be related to library path. Readelf output
>>> shows that, RPATH var env.
>>>
>>> Searching mailing list archive I found this, which is exactly my problem:
>>>
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-May/067787.html
>>>
>>> Question is; how make RPATH search for 32-bit version of libX11, libXext
>>> and libXpm?
>>>
>>> My .cshrc has a setenv LD_32_LIBRARY_PATH /usr/local/lib32/compat, but
>>> that did not help.
>>>
>>> More ideas?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Luciano.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22 November 2014 at 11:21, Bernt Hansson <bah@bananmonarki.se> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2014-11-22 13:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Xview is broken.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2014-11-22 07:45, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hm! Well, that doesn't look like it's a problem with a 64 bit system
>>>>>> in particular - see where that .tmpl file is supposed to be?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> :/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/xview # make
>>>> ===>   xview-3.2.1.4.19c_1 depends on executable: mkfontdir - found
>>>> ===>   xview-3.2.1.4.19c_1 depends on executable: mkfontscale - found
>>>> ^[ (escape) menu ^y search prompt ^k delete line   ^p prev li     ^g
>>>> prev page
>>>> make -f Imakefile
>>>> "Imakefile", line 3: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 4: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 5: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 9: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 10: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 11: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 20: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 21: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 38: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 39: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 42: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 43: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 44: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 45: Missing dependency operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 46: Missing dependency operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 47: Missing dependency operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 48: Missing dependency operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 49: Missing dependency operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 50: Missing dependency operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 53: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 54: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 63: Missing dependency operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 101: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 102: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 103: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 143: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 144: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 145: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 165: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 166: Need an operator
>>>> "Imakefile", line 167: Need an operator
>>>> make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomgnyUWeA79rT%2BuMkMS3M_sK2_a%2BcajXLM5MWkgXd8_vw>