Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 13:29:41 +0100 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl> To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Proposal: Removing doscmd from the source tree... Message-ID: <38733935.C8691F71@scc.nl> References: <3871FC69.C99882E9@scc.nl>, <20000104225739.A865@peotl.tuebingen.netsurf.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Zenker wrote: > > A possibility could be: 1. build it for i386 only, 2. build it via > buildworld without X11, regardless if X11 exists. If I want to use it > with X11, it is interactive and I can make it for X11 by hand - it will > not break on compile runs at some hour at night. I'll commit a fix that will prevent including X when DESTDIR has been set. In practice this means that doscmd will never include X, unless you compile it by hand. This of course implies that you have to compile doscmd by hand every time you do an installworld, given that you want X. I still think doscmd should and can be a port, but I think it helps my argument if I have the port ready to be committed and downloadable for testing. It helps undermine the general objection that doscmd is very dependent on the kernel, which I doubt... If not, it will at least show me that I'm wrong :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project mailto:marcel@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38733935.C8691F71>