From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  8 07:31:24 2013
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id ADF9C352; Mon,  8 Apr 2013 07:31:24 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 07:31:24 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r315756 - in head/net: ntp ntp-devel ntp-rc
Message-ID: <20130408073124.GA14697@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201304080510.r385Axhj037385@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20130408063433.GA38357@hatter>
 <20130408070307.GB81897@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130408070307.GB81897@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org,
 Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org>, portmgr@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 07:31:24 -0000

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:03:07AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Yes conversion wasn't complete, this patch makes it completes so if cy@ is ok
> with it, you get the portmgr approval.

The question remains, however, how could the first (incomplete) patch went
through portmgr@...

./danfe