Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 13:14:02 +0200 From: MITA Yoshio <Yoshio.Mita@isen.fr> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: grog@lemis.com, mike@smith.net.au, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ghostscript 5 port is broken Message-ID: <199710131114.NAA05928@pcmita> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 13 Oct 1997 03:21:29 PDT." <199710131021.DAA07317@bubble.didi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The problems of print/ghostscript5 are solved by using the latest bsd.port.mk ($Id: bsd.port.mk,v 1.265 1997/10/08 05:04:48 asami Exp $). I've checked building print/ghostscript5 yesterday under 2.2.2-RELEASE with the latest bsd.port.mk fetched from ftp.freebsd.org., it works. It's also true that with some older version of bsd.port.mk (e.g. that of 2.2.2-RELEASE), compilation fails for some reasons: One reason is lack of SH ?= /bin/sh entry in bsd.port.mk, and the other I don't know. Now it's working anyway. Regards, MITA Yoshio :> * > * - It requires the jpeg6 and png ports for building, but fails to :> * > * detect that they are already installed. Instead, it depends on :> * > * the file /nonexistent, ie. it *always* extracts, builds and installs :> * > * both these ports. This will fail if they have already been :> * > * installed. :> * > You need a new bsd.port.mk for both these things. :> * Don't I get that with a 'make world'? I have: :> * :> * $ l /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk :> * -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 54241 Oct 9 04:15 /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk :> * I've built ghostscript 5 twice in the last couple of weeks on a :> * -current less than 7 days old, and I can confirm both these points. --- MITA Yoshio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710131114.NAA05928>