Date: 05 Oct 2004 09:01:04 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Release Compiler options Message-ID: <44is9p9v5b.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <200410051237.56653.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2201FFC245@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <200410051045.15454.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> <20041005100007.GC9642@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <200410051237.56653.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> writes: > Ok, so share/examples/etc/make.conf is not evaluated like > etc/defautls/make.conf was before? That's the point I guess. /etc/defaults/make.conf was *never* evaluated. That's *why* it was moved out to the examples tree.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44is9p9v5b.fsf>