Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 00:29:31 +0900 From: Jun USHIDA <ushida@msa.biglobe.ne.jp> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compiling FORTRAN code on -stable Message-ID: <1000328002931.414EE703.1022002@msa.biglobe.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 26 Mar 2000 22:30:26 -0500". <20000326223026.A46836@ipass.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20000326223026.A46836@ipass.net> aa8vb@ipass.net wrote:
|Apparently f77 compilers will eat this, but our f77 (from bin or ports)
|will not.
RELNOTES.TXT of FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE says,
> The f77 emulation via f2c has been replaced by a native F77 compiler.
In my 4.0-STABLE,
/usr/bin/f77 (g77 v0.5.24)
/usr/local/bin/fc (/usr/ports/lang/{f77,f2c},/usr/ports/devel/fpp)
Your example FORTRAN code can be compiled with /usr/bin/f77(g77).
It would seem that /usr/bin/f77(g77) shows slightly better performance than
/usr/local/bin/fc. I think that's why f2c is replased in 4.0-RELEASE or later.
Is this recognition right ?
--
Jun Ushida
PGP finger print = E2 03 93 99 0B C4 C0 35 80 BC FF A3 CE 5C 96 C7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1000328002931.414EE703.1022002>