Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:59:05 +1100 (EST)
From:      <daniel@electroteque.org>
To:        <grog@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Web Editing?
Message-ID:  <44298.203.15.102.65.1074553145.squirrel@www.electroteque.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040119223701.GG95584@wantadilla.lemis.com>
References:  <20040119223701.GG95584@wantadilla.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Monday, 19 January 2004 at  8:25:28 -0600, Eric F Crist wrote:
> Content-Description: signed data
>> What do people here use to edit HTML documents?  I usually use
>> Dreamweaver, but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working
>> so I can run Dreamweaver on FreeBSD.
>
> Is Dreamweaver output standards compliant?  Most HTML generated by HTML
> editors looks terrible and creates multiple warnings and possibly error
> messages from validators such as http://validator.w3.org/ or HTML tidy
> (/usr/ports/www/tidy).
>
> I use Emacs with a number of macros to create the more complex
> structures.  It includes a pass through HTML tidy to reformat and
> correct any errors.

I think Macromedia have soughted that all out by now in MX. Frankly i
havent found an editor for Unix that is as good as either
Quanta or Zend Studio or even Eclipse. Emacs and vi is bollox.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44298.203.15.102.65.1074553145.squirrel>