Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:26:33 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Jose M. Alcaide" <jose@we.lc.ehu.es> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should we keep the vim5 port? Message-ID: <20011107152632.D12949@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20011107190747.D338@v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es>; from jose@we.lc.ehu.es on Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:07:47PM %2B0100 References: <20011107074751.A93028@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011107190747.D338@v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:07:47PM +0100, Jose M. Alcaide wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:47:51AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > Now that Vim 6.0 is out (with most .0 bug fixes); do we still need the > > vim5 port? > > BTW, is there any reason for not building with GTK as default? This is the > "recommended" GUI by the Vim author, I think. Please do not be vauge. I assume you are talking about the vim5 port and not the vim[6] port. But I cannot tell for sure. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011107152632.D12949>