From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 20 19:49:34 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E61B3F9
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:49:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from butcher-nb.yandex.net (hub.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:88])
 by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653E8475C;
 Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:49:33 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <544566D2.40303@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:47:30 +0400
From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matthew Grooms <mgrooms@shrew.net>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Broken IPsec + enc +pf/ipfw
References: <544535C2.9020301@shrew.net>
In-Reply-To: <544535C2.9020301@shrew.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:49:34 -0000

On 20.10.2014 20:18, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> Lastly, I tried to locate a relevant PR but didn't find anything
> concrete. Is this related to the issue? And if so, can it be MFCd?
> 
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110959

Did you try the patch from last PR? It is small and should be applicable
to stable/10.

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov