From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 18 16:28:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA85E16A403 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from alnrmhc12.comcast.net (alnrmhc12.comcast.net [206.18.177.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B338543D5F for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:28:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com?[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20060918162815b1200ngp6fe>; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:28:16 +0000 Message-ID: <450EC91F.2030802@computer.org> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:28:15 -0500 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <450DC9D9.6050000@verysmall.org> <450DCEDB.9080301@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <450DCEDB.9080301@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: [OT] Re: how to apply a patch set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:28:17 -0000 On 09/17/2006 17:40, Matthew Seaman wrote: > pobox@verysmall.org wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to apply a patch set to FreeBSD 5.5 (this letter 'p' >> followed by a number, after the version in 'uname -a') - but somehow it >> did not work. > > The '#N' business after the version number is a counter showing how > many times you've updated your kernel. For the longest time this counter has never increased for me (it used to). It now stays at zero, yet I have rebuilt world numerous times. Must be something in the way I am doing things. Any idea what would cause it to *not* increase? > > Cheers, > > Matthew > -- Regards, Eric