Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 12:36:36 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: INDEX[-5] files were removed from CVS. Message-ID: <opshe1zab59aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <20041114022626.G60099@juana.isp.net.au> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411130921580.15243-100000@pancho> <20041114022626.G60099@juana.isp.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 02:29:16 +1100 (EST), Mark Russell <freebsd@mark.net.au> wrote: > On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Mark Linimon wrote: > >> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Mark Russell wrote: >> >>> So major changes to 2 stable branches have been discussed in non public >>> lists and non gives a hoot on the effects on how it effects the general >>> userbase? >> >> Yes, amongst the ports administrators and release engineers. >> >> The theory was that it should have no negative effect. If cvsup >> is deleting the file then that's a problem; adding INDEX to your >> refuse file is probably the best solution. > > As I've already pointed out this has had major effect also the work > around you mentioned was not documented, damn 02:30 on a Sunday morning > and I have to update a few hundred boxes beause of crap that wasn't > discused, thanx guys *NOT* Why not use NFS? If you do, it will be a box that need to update. >> mcl -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opshe1zab59aq2h7>