From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 30 23:01:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB39106566B for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:01:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zantgo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11B28FC12 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyg14 with SMTP id 14so6753601qyg.13 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:01:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=rT4OyNfJKm+w1XgGR5iGA2VX1osg4KT6iWnaKo9TVto=; b=GoCfZon0q3Nf4cVg9ShqQYGXzOwZSeLZ7fN6q6EuFqeaJgqYCSiPujy4TVq0v3elyU tQsSoTBPnTRtNtJyHszGO6wPNIUgCWsPMMSf/7vXMq0Lqm/nLkR7OQQGLGdYFPtBsoT1 6ZJme5JPpsRf5kwV3oXNg3UcUXU1BGzQ6PBxQ= Received: by 10.229.221.20 with SMTP id ia20mr2310777qcb.120.1320015691153; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([181.42.66.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v6sm27614172qaz.7.2011.10.30.16.01.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:01:30 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPod Mail (9A334) From: Zantgo Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:01:30 -0300 To: Warren Block Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: The ports are really funcional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:01:32 -0000 El 30-10-2011, a las 19:55, Warren Block escribi=C3=B3:= > On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote: >=20 >> What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost n= o one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also instal= l KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors, commonly solocionables, f= or example I had to modify "REFRESH" to "true", but also to get out other er= rors, commonly have a solution, but is a great problem to have to spend all h= is time fixing bugs. Please tell me if it is natural to every time I downloa= d large modifying ports so, if so, then why say "functional"? >=20 > Yes, ports work well. =46rom the description, it's difficult to tell what= is causing the problem. Please supply additional information, like what ve= rsion of FreeBSD and the exact output of one of the errors (script(1) is use= ful for that). Also see the section in the Handbook about packages and port= s: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html >=20 > Translations of the Handbook can be found at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/Fre= eBSD/doc/ in the books subdirectory. the problem is not the problem, since most are solving the problem is that t= here are many errors and problems, then as I say it is stable and functional= ?=