From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 08:23:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8E816A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:23:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from acampi.inet.it (acampi.inet.it [213.92.1.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82AC43D2D for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:23:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrea@acampi.inet.it) Received: by acampi.inet.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B421CAC; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:23:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:23:55 +0100 From: Andrea Campi To: Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko Message-ID: <20041216082355.GA58798@webcom.it> References: <41BBA812.2030006@errno.com> <20041212184020.W3369@ync.qbhto.arg> <1103166432.995.15.camel@RabbitsDen> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1103166432.995.15.camel@RabbitsDen> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Sam Leffler cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WEP and 802.11 drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:23:58 -0000 On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:07:12PM -0500, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote: > Since adding wlan_wep to the kernel config, I do not have traps and > double faults, but neither I have wireless connectivity -- card gets > configured and claims to associate, occasionally I even get as far as > obtaining address via DHCP, but that is all I can get. Intermittently I > get 'host is down' from ping. At that point, ifconfig would show > 'status' as 'no carrier'. Try playing with /usr/src/tools/tools/ath/80211debug and set different flags until you get some more info. If you see it whining about invalid transitions from INIT -> RUN, you are seeing the same issue I am. Sam didn't reply to an email about this, so might be either too busy or not interested on fixing wi (although at least a reply to that effect would be nice). I'll probably start debugging this during the holidays, or I'll have to go back to 5.STABLE, which I would hate. Bye, Andrea -- I believe the technical term is "Oops!"