Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:14:00 +0700 (ICT)
From:      Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th>
To:        rwatson@freebsd.org
Cc:        net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Running into an mbuf leak with bridging and tap
Message-ID:  <200411231014.iANAE07p098973@mail.cs.ait.ac.th>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041123093708.66539K-100000@fledge.watson.org> (message from Robert Watson on Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:00:55 %2B0000 (GMT))

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm running an ethernet over TCP bridge using a combination of the native
> ethernet bridge support and the tap driver.  Basically, a daemon sits on
> /dev/tapX and bridges ethernet frames using a small header over a TCP

Yup i think I have seen the same thing while I was using a combination
of vtun (IP over IP tunnelling), tap and bridge.

As it was a one day only experiment that was not critical and I just
incresed mbuf.

Olivier



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411231014.iANAE07p098973>