Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 05 Mar 1999 19:13:43 +0900
From:      "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
To:        Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@freedomnet.com>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ATAPI and ATAPI_STATIC with the new ATA* driver?
Message-ID:  <36DFAE57.60DFD4D1@newsguy.com>
References:  <000001be6663$b897bca0$1468f0c6@tech.freedomnet.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Kelly Yancey wrote:
> 
> have to support ATA devices too. He also suggested a more universal device
> name like drv0, drv1, drv2, etc rather than deliniating between whether the
> drive is ATA or SCSI...I also think that is a good idea as I don't see any
> good reason an application should care whether the drive is ATA or SCSI, as
> long as the functionality is provided does it matter how?

The boot code might be distressed... :-)

--
Daniel C. Sobral			(8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org

	"FreeBSD is Yoda, Linux is Luke Skywalker."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36DFAE57.60DFD4D1>