Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:12:25 -0300
From:      "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" <lioux@uol.com.br>
To:        "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>
Cc:        bmah@FreeBSD.org, Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/aic7xxx aic7xxx.c aic7xxx.seq aic7xxx_freebsd.c aic7xxx_inline.h aic7xxx_pci.c
Message-ID:  <20010221221225.A47703@Fedaykin.here>
In-Reply-To: <200102212157.f1LLvWO45599@aslan.scsiguy.com>; from gibbs@scsiguy.com on Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:57:10PM -0700
References:  <200102212147.f1LLlCo21978@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <200102212157.f1LLvWO45599@aslan.scsiguy.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:57:10PM -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> Hmm.
> 
> o We now attach to chips that are in "RAID Port" mode.  So, if you
>   happen to have an ARO-XXX card in your system, we'll still allow
>   you to use the on-MB chip as a SCSI controller.
> 
> o We now attach to all AAA-XXX cards.  The ARO product is a parity
>   engine that connects to the SCSI controller shipped with your vendor's
>   "Raid Port" enabled MB.  The AAA is the same except that it comes with
>   its own SCSI controller.
> 
> o The driver now handles several chip errata it didn't handle in the past.
>   Which MB/controller combinations this effects is hard to say.
> 
> o The driver is smart enough not to attach to aic7XXX chips that are
>   controlled by an on-MB AAC RAID controller.  You'd only find this
>   on certain Dell systems.
> 
> o Recent commits fixed some of the PCI ID handling that caused us to
>   incorrectly attach to AAC controlled adapters, not attach to the
>   second channel of certain aic7899 installations with unconventional
>   subdevice Ids, etc.  These bugs never made it into any release.
> 
> o 2742T support was broken for some time.  I don't believe that any of these
>   bugs made it into a release, but I could be wrong.
> 
> o Lots of performance improvements.

	Perhaps a (null) commit would be in order?
	Or, is this too much? :) Just checking, I don't know. I am
still getting used to FreeBSD committing etiquette.

	Regards,

-- 
Mario S F Ferreira - UnB - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature."
lioux at ( freebsd dot org | linf dot unb dot br )
flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010221221225.A47703>