From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 6 18:04:46 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE84716A468 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 18:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87B8713C44C for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 18:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 25462 invoked by uid 399); 6 Jun 2007 17:38:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jun 2007 17:38:05 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <4666F0FB.8020101@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:38:03 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070525) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Divacky References: <20070604162430.GA76813@freebsd.org> <896DB1FBFFD5A145833D9DA08CA12A85051A7F@seaxch07.desktop.isilon.com> <20070606074429.GA42032@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20070606074429.GA42032@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Lemar , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 18:04:47 -0000 Roman Divacky wrote: > my current patch is at: www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/linux_at.patch > > it does not implement the native fbsd syscalls, only the linuxulator ones > but adding those is a matter of minutes. I asked for a review by pjd and/or > rwatson and hopefully this will get commited soon.. My recollection of the last round of discussion was that you were asked to implement these in our base, then wrap the linux versions. If it's trivial to implement, it should probably be done that way first. I also think you should take the offer collaboration with the Isilon guys. Getting the benefit of their experience is a good thing. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection