From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 23 22:34:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5E3106566B for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gkontos.mail@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BD98FC12 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iadj38 with SMTP id j38so18035436iad.13 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:34:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+/teKwd9XXt902acIEyBApMAJcVTh+3jeRudpPPM8Q0=; b=u0F7NvJv093CiGcvMyiPVPMw2BOqt039W0nP4KPyDAN/svKL3YmfFo9wxtswpmhghY cUrJYGx3YKSDDxSctIstXg9RauXHl+yR2dDGH3autFshJTBzjBWbq+CkcgeLyGB6ETF3 pglVZ9KSrZJBk21rp2fzr7Xu3LSW0qFrB1+1c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.180.138 with SMTP id do10mr15724221igc.20.1324679692505; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:34:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.15.7 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:34:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111223220217.GB15456@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <4EF4A75C.2040609@my.gd> <4EF4B2D6.5090206@sentex.net> <4EF4B982.3070207@missouri.edu> <4EF4C08A.3080609@sentex.net> <4EF4CB2E.4030109@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20111223204838.GA43740@in-addr.com> <20111223220217.GB15456@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 00:34:52 +0200 Message-ID: From: George Kontostanos To: Peter Jeremy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:34:53 -0000 On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2011-Dec-23 23:40:10 +0200, George Kontostanos wrote: >>In any case, and IMHO this was not the proper time for this kind of >>advisories considering the fact that many companies are in a freeze >>period. > > My honeypot logs suggest that the black hats aren't taking a holiday. > As Colin posted, the SO had to decide between two unpalatable options > and, IMHO, he made the correct decision. =A0The details and fixes are > now available - it's up to you to weigh up the risks of patching vs > the risks of not patching. > > -- > Peter Jeremy If a security advisory is announced, you have to patch, period! Happy holidays to all. Black hats too :) --=20 George