From owner-cvs-ports  Wed Jan 21 04:00:36 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA17871
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 04:00:36 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-ports)
Received: from baloon.mimi.com (sjx-ca126-30.ix.netcom.com [207.92.177.222])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA17794;
          Wed, 21 Jan 1998 03:59:43 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost)
	by baloon.mimi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA27952;
	Wed, 21 Jan 1998 03:59:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from asami)
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 03:59:42 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199801211159.DAA27952@baloon.mimi.com>
To: tg@freebsd.org
CC: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199801211146.DAA10137@freefall.freebsd.org> (message from Satoshi Asami on Wed, 21 Jan 1998 03:46:45 -0800 (PST))
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/math/numpy Makefile ports/x11/pythonqt Makefile
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 *     math/numpy           Makefile 
 *     x11/pythonqt         Makefile 
 *   Log:
 *   Mark these ports broken.  They are not happy with python upgrades.

I don't know how to handle cases like this correctly, but I think in
general a mail from the "depended" port maintainer to "depending" port
maintainers would be nice.  If you can coordinate your efforts and
commit your changes all at once, even better.

At a minimum, I would like to have the "depended" port upgrade being
accompanied by the "depending" ports being marked broken.  That way a
top-down package building won't die in the middle and I don't have to
figure out what's going on myself (which should have been obvious to
the committer but not to users, including myself).

Now, in this case, all three maintainers are actually one person (or
at least they share the same mail address), so I'm just going to
assume you just forgot to commit changes to other ports, Thomas.
Please mark these ports unbroken when you rectify that. :)

Satoshi