Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:22:22 -0400
From:      Maikoda Sutter <maikodaraine@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   use of the kernel and licensing
Message-ID:  <CAJ+vzi9RZN5F50fCDJBGJ23R2+rhAsC10WSt_PMeFhO=WU3UZA@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bits, or could release
it under it's own license?

For example: I would like to rewrite the headers to be 100% POSIX compliant
and I do like the BSD license, however I was planning on releasing my whole
system under the Unlicense, I understand that certain headers and code that
I do not modify has to be released under the BSD license as that is the
original license of the code, however for headers or code that I modify can
I release it under the Unlicense (http://unlicense.org/)?

I do plan on giving credit where it is due and such to the wonderful
developers of FreeBSD and those that wrote the original code because
without you I would not be able to produce so rapidly that which I am
looking to produce I just would like clarification on the extent that I
would have to license things via the BSD license.

Respectively Yours,

Maikoda Raine
Arrogant Penguin Industries



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ+vzi9RZN5F50fCDJBGJ23R2+rhAsC10WSt_PMeFhO=WU3UZA>