From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 2 19:23:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4466AA8; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 19:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA6DD9D4; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 19:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sA2JNWxO090212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 2 Nov 2014 12:23:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id sA2JNVI4090209; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 12:23:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 12:23:31 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: Small motd nit in 10.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <8C81A636-D2B5-4EFB-9EA3-58E88E16CA94@spam.lifeforms.nl> <93E9657A-737E-4705-A0E5-01F9E9110261@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <201410301554.03504.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 02 Nov 2014 12:23:32 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Walter Hop X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 19:23:34 -0000 On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Warren Block wrote: > >> There is room on that line to show both: >> >> Show details of the FreeBSD installation: uname -a ; freebsd-version >> >> Or some combination like that. > > Actually, I think the output from 'freebsd-version ; uname -a' is less > ambiguous. Since nobody has complained about this, I'll update head now and plan to MFC it. Hopefully it will be in time for 10.1-RELEASE.