Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:41:41 -0500 From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Subject: Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server Message-ID: <CACqU3MWiMpUNJ9d2t=OxfDHD47evvkgKcwLkiNBgEheWFJrzjw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EE9A2A0.80607@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <CAJ-FndDniGH8QoT=kUxOQ%2BzdVhWF0Z0NKLU0PGS-Gt=BK6noWw@mail.gmail.com> <4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com> <CAFHbX1%2B5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com> <4EE933C6.4020209@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CAPjTQNEJDE17TLH-mDrG_-_Qa9R5N3mSeXSYYWtqz_DFidzYQw@mail.gmail.com> <20111215024249.GA13557@icarus.home.lan> <4EE9A2A0.80607@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA > it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is using a kernel + compiler almost 2 years old, it still manages to out-perform the bleeding edge FreeBSD :-) Now, from what I've read so far in this thread, it seems that a lot of people are still in abnegation... my 0.2c, - Arnaud > It may be worth to discuss the sad performance of FBSD in some parts of > the benchmark. A difference of a factor 10 or 100 is simply far beyond > disapointing, it is more than inacceptable and by just reading those > benchmarks, I'd like to drop thinking of using FreeBSD even as a backend > server in scientific and business environments. In detail, some of the > SciMark benches look disappointing. The overall image can't help over > the fact that in C-Ray FreeBSD is better performing. > > From the compiler, I'd like say there couldn't be a drop of more than 10 > - 15% in performance - but not 10 or 100 times. > > I'm just thinking about the discussion of SCHED_ULE and all the saur > spots we discussed when I stumbled over the test. > > Regards, > Oliver >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACqU3MWiMpUNJ9d2t=OxfDHD47evvkgKcwLkiNBgEheWFJrzjw>