From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 19:20:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF33D16A4CE; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:20:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12AE43D1D; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:20:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.0.35.182] (g35-182.icann.org[192.0.35.182]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20050411192028013000lqibe>; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:20:28 +0000 Message-ID: <425ACDFB.1080102@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:20:27 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050326) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Weinberger References: <425A32C8.30080.1710F6F5@localhost> <425A3579.2138.171B7898@localhost> <425AB7E0.2030101@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <425AB7E0.2030101@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:20:35 -0000 Adam Weinberger wrote: > I believe emphatically that the sanity tests should be non-optional. And I believe emphatically the opposite. And your comment about the procmail filter is totally unsuitable for those who pay for their bandwidth by the byte. The more burdens you add to ports maintainers the fewer of them we will be able to attract. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection