From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 26 23:03:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8770A37B404 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:03:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from adsl-63-194-196-21.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (adsl-63-194-196-21.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.194.196.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE3643F3F for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:03:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@adsl-63-194-196-21.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net) Received: from adsl-63-194-196-21.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id h2R73IBu019669; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:03:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@adsl-63-194-196-21.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net) Received: (from steve@localhost)id h2R73HDa019668; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:03:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:03:17 -0800 From: Steve Sizemore To: Terry Lambert Message-ID: <20030327070317.GA19434@math.berkeley.edu> References: <200303260034.aa92057@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <3E81160B.E5406C60@mindspring.com> <20030326035938.GF1713@dan.emsphone.com> <3E816243.AED1CB4F@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E816243.AED1CB4F@mindspring.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.5 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Re: NFS -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Steve Sizemore List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 07:03:23 -0000 On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:18:11AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > In fact, the only legitimate argument I have ever heard for UDP > has been "I have an old Linux install that can't talk TCP, as > only UDP was implemented at the time I installed it". Hi, Terry - Have you already forgotten the locking problem that you were helping me with last week? The only solution was to use UDP. Steve -- Steve Sizemore , (510) 642-8570 Unix System Manager Dept. of Mathematics and College of Letters and Science University of California, Berkeley