Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 30 Apr 2006 13:53:28 -0400
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Stacey Roberts <stacey@vickiandstacey.com>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.14 being merged into the tree
Message-ID:  <1146419608.26519.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060430093508.GC3604@crom.vickiandstacey.com>
References:  <1146349274.16564.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1146362183.16564.25.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20060430093508.GC3604@crom.vickiandstacey.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-W418prJYa3gBC9C3qAXo
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 10:35 +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote:
> Hello Joe,
>=20
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>=20
> > On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 18:21 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > At this late stage of the 5.5/6.1 release cycle, it was deemed that n=
one
> > > of the packages were going to be rebuilt, so we have been given
> > > permission to merge GNOME 2.14 into the ports tree at this time.
> > >=20
> > > The first step will be a merge of GStreamer 0.10.  When that is
> > > complete, the tree will be locked for the GNOME 2.14 merge.  The good
> > > news is that this latest update no longer comes with the shared libra=
ry
> > > change for GLib, GTK+, or any other low-level GNOME component, so
> > > upgrading will be much easier.
> > >=20
> > > I will send out another email when all the dust settles.
> >=20
> > Okay, GNOME 2.14 is now in the tree, and things should have settled.
> > Please report any problems to gnome@FreeBSD.org.
>=20
> Just read UPDATING, and wanted to ask about something, please.
>=20
> One of the steps includes: "portupgrade -o x11/gnome-screensaver -f xscre=
ensaver-gnome", which
> replaces xscreensaver-gnome with gnome-screensaver, yes?
>=20
> Are they now both the same in terms of stability and feature-set?
>=20
> At present, there are differences between the two whereby xscreensaver-gn=
ome provides "Blank
> After, Cycle After and Lock Screen After" settings which are not availabl=
e in gnome-screensaver.
> There is also the fact that there are the "Display Modes" tab as well as =
"Advanced" tab in
> xscreensaver-gnome, that are not available in gnome-screensaver as well.

Then switch back to xscreensaver-gnome.  It's not going away.  The
default screensaver has just switched to gnome-screensaver to be inline
with the official GNOME Desktop.

Joe

--=20
Joe Marcus Clarke
FreeBSD GNOME Team      ::      gnome@FreeBSD.org
FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome

--=-W418prJYa3gBC9C3qAXo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBEVPmYb2iPiv4Uz4cRAjVEAJ0dwNSbY12XCKy2BFj93vdhr3QvHACeMuqf
af+wTs6lb4jwjeKCyEi0cAQ=
=NxBI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-W418prJYa3gBC9C3qAXo--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1146419608.26519.2.camel>