Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:40:42 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Alexander Kabaev <ak03@gte.com>, current@FreeBSD.org, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: i386 tinderbox failure Message-ID: <20021008224042.GA13880@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021008155536.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20021008142335.13e7a72d.ak03@gte.com> <XFMail.20021008155536.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the > vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the > fix you don't need to worry about maintaining the local patch so > committing it onto the vendor branch is ok. Doing this screws up diffs to vendor source as there won't be a tag that corisponds with this across all files. For small contribed things that is OK. But when doing large ones it the following import+merge becomes harder. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021008224042.GA13880>